数图研究

Coyle在他的博文中转述马里兰大学Fred von Lohmann的建议，FBI的标准版权声明应该这样写：

WARNING. Federal law allows citizens to reproduce, distribute, or exhibit portions of copyright motion pictures, video tapes, or video discs under certain circumstances without authorization of the copyright holder. This infringement of copyright is called “Fair use” and is allowed for purposes of criticism, news reporting, teaching, and parody.

警告：联邦法律允许公民在某些特定情况下未经版权持有人许可而复制、发布或展览具有版权的动画、录像带、影碟等资料。这种版权的例外称为”合理使用”，适用于评述、新闻报道、教学以及恶搞。

• Slashdot | Libraries Say DRM May Harm Their Services # BBC的原文访问不了，只好连接这个摘要 The BBC is reporting that the British Library is concerned about DRM’s effect on its ability to make materials available to the public. Libraries have a legal right to distribute materials under the Fair Use provisions of the copyright law, but DRM systems may block this. Furthermore, they point out that DRM systems don’t automatically switch themselves off when a work goes out of copyright. DRM systems may allow copyright holders to retain control over their material longer than they are legally entitled to. Worse yet, if the software no longer exists to unlock a DRM-protected file, its contents may be lost forever — exactly the thing libraries are intended to prevent.’ We’ve discussed stories like this before.
• SSRN-Google Book Search: Fair Use, Fair Dealing and the Case for Intermediary Copying by Paul Ganley # google数字图书馆计划的法律问题。值得参考 This article examines the legality of Google’s Library Project under U.S. and U.K. copyright law. The Library Project provides a useful example of the divergence in approach to copyright exceptions in these two jurisdictions. In particular, whilst Google’s plans have generated a great deal of controversy, it at least has an arguable case under U.S. law that its use is fair use. No analogous argument can be made under U.K law. The main purpose of this article is to highlight this distinction and to suggest that U.K copyright law is failing to adequately account for transformations in the mode and manner in which individuals interact with information.

• E-LIS - Against intellectual property # 比老槐”遵守但不尊重”有过之而无不及 There is a strong case for opposing intellectual property. Among other things, it often retards innovation and exploits Third World peoples. Most of the usual arguments for intellectual property do not hold up under scrutiny. In particular, the metaphor of the marketplace of ideas provides no justification for ownership of ideas. The alternative to intellectual property is that intellectual products not be owned, as in the case of everyday language. Strategies against intellectual property include civil disobedience, promotion of non-owned information, and fostering of a more cooperative society.
• Columns by PC Magazine: Much Ado over Google Book Search # 一个G拥鼐 Google is grinding through various library collections for every book it can scan, without asking for permission. I, for one, think that’s great. I see that my last book, Online! The Book, is in the collection, but this doesn’t bother me, because I am apparently one of the few out there who has used Google Book Search. I found it anything but a threat to book sales or anything else to do with publishing.
• Wayne Graham’s Blog: Copyright and Intellectual Property # some links on copyright and fair use Once someone has copied your work, your copyright is no longer automatic. It’s then up to you to convince a Federal Judge that you are the copyright owner.
• Stephen’s Web ~ by Stephen Downes ~ # 厉害，图书馆为什么不可以做出版商？！ so why not spent the acquisitions budget on publishing instead? Stop paying to buy publications, and start paying to produce them.
• 盗版之我见 - An的视觉箱 - 电影博客 - 互联影库 # 图书馆对于防盗*版还有作用，不是说图书馆就是盗*版吧 在国外就没有盗*版，人家素质高！我说：你Y被骗了！在美国，几乎每一个居民聚居的区都会有一个不错的公共图书馆，
• Open Access News # Andrew Raff has put together Another Google Book Search Commentary Roundup (December 2), ‘the most interesting articles and podcasts about the Google Book Search and copyright law that have been published and posted since [his] last collection of links’ (November 9).
• IPTAblog: Google Print and Fair Use # Google Print is the topic that may single-handedly keep the copyright-related blog world in business for the next few years.
• IPTAblog: Another Google Book Search Commentary Roundup # Here are the most interesting articles and podcasts about the Google Book Search and copyright law that have been published and posted since my last collection of links.
• Public Domain Art in an Age of Easier Mechanical Reproducibility # 博物馆凭什么声称拥有藏品的版权？复杂的版权问题。有空再看。 In principle a work of art has always been reproducible [1]. In all the arts there is a physical component which can no longer be considered or treated as it used to be, which cannot remain unaffected by our modern knowledge and power [2]. Walter Benjamin opened his 1936 essay, Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit, with the first observation quoted above.
• 盗版10年 - demo@virushuo #
• 盗版是打破垄断的利器么？ - 李卫公的长安城 #

Powered by Zoundry